<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Regret the Error - Latest Comments in Apology</title><link>http://regrettheerror.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://regrettheerror.disqus.com/apology_092/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:33:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apology</title><link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/11/02/apology-209/#comment-21692686</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can't help but wonder exactly how much fact-checking was done here. I would think that any sensible person, especially a reporter, who hears such an outlandish claim would do a LOT of research to verify the story. And then it took them 2.5 years to publish an apology? I wonder if the funeral home finally contacted them after they discovered why people stopped using their services.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">devika_melora</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:33:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>